The Most Revolutionary Act

Uncensored updates on world events, economics, the environment and medicine

The Most Revolutionary Act

The First 100 Days, the Method Behind the Madness in the Court Challenges

Jonathan Turley

The first 100 days of the Trump administration have been described in the same way on sites ranging from the ACLU to Vanity Fair: Chaos.

It seems like the Justice Department is battling everywhere on everything at the same time.

It is indeed chaos, but it is not necessarily as random or as reckless as it may seem to the naked eye.

I have been critical of a number of legal moves by the Trump administration, including policies that undermine free speech values. Yet there is a type of legal chaos theory behind all of these actions. In science, chaos theory suggests that, even in a system of seemingly random actions, there can be patterns and interconnections.

The hyperkinetic litigation around the country reflects two realities.

First, Democratic state governments and groups have a massive war chest to challenge any and every new policy of President Trump. In California, the Democrats actually pre-approved a litigation fund before the inauguration to do precisely that.

Second, and more importantly, Trump promised sweeping changes from immigration to transgender policies to education reforms.

If you know that you are going to be challenged, it is better to get into court as soon as possible to move critical cases through the legal system. What you need is finality. Even if you lose cases, you need to know what authority you have.

Immigration wins

This is an administration in a hurry. Trump learned in his first term that you need to move as fast and as far as possible in the first two years of a presidential term.

With the midterm elections looming, Trump knows that reforms may end and investigations and impeachments will begin if the Democrats retake the House in 2026.

Despite some losses, the Justice Department has succeeded generally in reaffirming its authority to seek the reduction of government and to root out waste. It has also made real progress in other areas.

Take the area of greatest success for the Trump administration: Immigration.

One thing that was clearly established in the first 100 days is that the entry of millions of unlawful immigrants was a choice made by the Biden administration and the Democrats. They could have stopped most of these entries at any time, but elected to leave the southern border effectively open for four years as millions poured over.

In a matter of weeks, Trump effectively closed the border. In February, there were just 8,326 southern border encounters, down from 189,913 in February 2024. Daily encounters this week declined 97% from Biden.

As many of us stated during the Biden administration, Democrats could have shut down the border, but clearly did not want to. Now with millions in the country, Democrats are calling for “pathways to citizenship” by arguing that there is no way to process so many illegals allowed in under Biden.

In the meantime, the public overwhelmingly favors deportations and elected Trump on his pledge to carry out such removals. Polling shows that 83% of Americans support deportations of immigrants with violent criminal records and roughly half support mass deportation of all undocumented persons.

A new CBS poll shows that, after the first 100 days, 56 percent approve of President Donald Trump’s “program to find and deport immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally.”

National injunctions

To carry out that policy, Trump is seeking to use new expedited systems. For the worst individuals, he has turned to the centuries-old Alien Enemies Act, a little-used act that presents a series of novel, unresolved questions.

Even with this smaller subset of detainees, individual hearings and appeals could make Biden’s decision to allow millions into the country a permanent reality. Many immigrants have been given initial court dates that extend beyond the Trump term.

Trump also pledged to reduce trade barriers for American exports and he is pushing existing laws to the breaking point on tariffs. He is right on the merits.

Even our closest allies impose unfair barriers to our goods and Trump sought to change the status quo with sweeping tariffs issued under his own authority.

Democrats have challenged that authority in various courts and, again, there are good-faith arguments that must be hashed out in court.

It is too early to tell how successful these cases will prove. However, a district court injunction (or even a dozen injunctions) a crisis does not make.

The Supreme Court is about to hear arguments on limiting the use of national injunctions and some of these district court decisions are highly challengeable on appeal.

There is no question that Trump is moving at a lightning speed and the Justice Department has to move at the same pace as the president.

There is also no question that it would better to slow down to avoid some of the unforced errors in the first 100 days.

However, Trump knows that time is of the essence. If he is going to realign the markets and make progress on issues like deportations, he has to put points on the board before the midterm elections. Ronald Reagan lost 26 seats in the House in his first midterm, Bill Clinton lost 54, and Barack Obama lost a breathtaking 63 seats.

The greatest problem for the Justice Department is that the White House and the political team appear to be largely dictating these moves. Political aides see these hills as worth dying on. Even if they lose in court, fighting to remove criminal aliens or to reduce certain foreign aid remains popular with voters.

Don’t alienate judges

The frenzy, however, can come at a cost. That includes alienating justices on the Supreme Court. The resistance to court orders and hyperbolic rhetoric seems to be wearing thin with members like Chief Justice John Roberts.

Trump will need these votes when they really count on big-ticket items like his inherent authority to act in areas ranging from markets to migrants.

Fights over Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia are burning time and effort. If he was simply returned as ordered by a court, Abrego Garcia could be promptly and correctly deported right back to El Salvador. He has no cognizable basis for remaining in the United States.

Richard Carlson, a Bay Area psychotherapist, famously wrote a book titled “Don’t Sweat the Small Stuff … and it’s all Small Stuff.” Fights like Garcia are small stuff.

Of course, much of what presidents do is “big stuff” and you have two years to make those things happen. In a curious way, the Trump administration is fortunate to have many of these issues in court early to gain greater finality on the lines of authority. However, it needs to focus on the big stuff . . . and a short calendar.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor at George Washington University and the author of best-selling book “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”

[…]

Via https://jonathanturley.org/2025/04/30/the-first-100-days-the-method-behind-the-madness-in-court-challenges/

On Free Speech, Trump as Bad as Biden

washington d.c. usa nov, 2019: vector illustration of america

By Jack Hunter

In September, candidate Donald Trump vowed, “I will bring back free speech in America…I will sign an executive order banning any federal employee from colluding to limit speech, and we will fire every federal bureaucrat who is engaged in domestic censorship under the Harris regime.”

Trump was addressing the clear danger that Democrats posed to the First Amendment.

The Republican presidential nominee was talking about the Democratic presidential nominee, Kamala Harris, who had once threatened to sic the Justice Department on social media platforms that “profit off hate.” In 2022, her choice for running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, said that “there’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech.” In 2021, Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said that the government needs to figure out how to “rein in the media environment.” The Biden administration had not only proposed a new federal agency that would regulate citizens’ speech, but was revealed to have pressured private social media companies to censor users’ speech, as revealed by the Twitter Files.

All of these anti-First Amendment actions, among many others, were not at all controversial to Democrats. In their blind hatred for Trump, the party had become one that began to see government censorship and regulation of speech as a positive good in their efforts to defeat or at least contain MAGA. As Hillary Clinton put it one month before the 2024 election, allowing free speech on social media was too dangerous because it means “we lost control.”

Luckily free speech mostly prevailed during that time period, but Clinton was right: The free flow of news and ideas coming from populist social media and alternative podcast worlds would end up helping to defeat Democrats in 2024.

Democracy prevailed, despite Democrats being so eager to suppress it.

Now, President Donald Trump is behaving like these Democrats.

The ACLU’s Allegra Harpootlian writes, “On March 25, [Rümeysa Öztürk] was planning to go to an iftar dinner with friends. Instead, while walking near her apartment, she was approached and then grabbed by a hooded man. Other figures soon closed in, including several wearing face coverings and dark clothing. Finally, one officer flashed a badge…”

Öztürk has not been charged with a crime. By all of the available evidence, she is seemingly being held for being a co-author of an op-ed that was critical of the Israeli’s government’s actions in Gaza.

Öztürk is but one of a number of those in the United States on student visas who have been arrested without charge for criticizing Israel’s government. Secretary of State Marco Rubio now brags that he has revoked over 300 student visas. “It might be more than 300 at this point. We do it every day,” Rubio said at a press conference in March.

“Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visa,” he said.

You’re a “lunatic” if you criticize Israel’s government?

Rubio continued, “At some point, I hope we run out because we’ve gotten rid of all of them, but we’re looking every day for these lunatics that are tearing things up.”

They should be charged with vandalism if they are literally tearing this up. But it was not clear that physical destruction or violence is what Rubio meant.

“We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not become a social activist that tears up our university campuses,” he added. “And if we’ve given you a visa and you decide to do that, we’re going to take it away.”

To note, the Supreme Court decided long ago that anyone in the United States has First Amendment protections, citizen or not.

Rubio would add, “We don’t want it in our country. Go back and do it in your country. But you’re not going to do it in our country.”

The Trump administration framing the suppression of free speech as a matter of non-citizens’ rights vs. those of citizens is a cheap way of ignoring the First Amendment, no different than the Biden administration holding up the supposed threats of “misinformation” and “disinformation” in the name of doing the same.

Republicans and Democrats have created spectres supposedly so threatening to convince enough people that the First Amendment no longer applies.

Bullshit.

So many Republicans right now argue that criticizing Israel’s government is inherently anti-semitic, which is about as ridiculous as arguing that every conservative talk host who criticizes the United States government is anti-American.

And if they genuinely were anti-semitic, that’s still protected by the First Amendment.

“Hate speech” is protected speech. Do Trump Republicans now agree with Biden-Harris Democrats like Tim Walz that there are no First Amendment protections for hate speech?

Apparently they do.

With Trump’s speech precedent, it’s not hard to imagine a future President Harris targeting conservative college students who challenge DEI or trans ideology. Leftists could argue—and do—that speech against minorities or LGBTQ members constitutes violence and therefore, somehow, falls outside of First Amendment protections.

So many of the Republicans who defend the arrest and deportation of those who criticize Israel’s government sound pretty much like identity politics-driven lefties. Their subjects are different but the logic is the same. Safe spaces, all around.

There are other examples of where the Trump administration has reneged on his free speech promises, and now just offers mirror images of Joe Biden’s censorship regime. I’m just focusing on one aspect.

One glimmer of hope is that while Democrats appeared to have reached a consensus over the last decades that censorship is a positive good, there is a loud and growing debate on the right over Trump’s affronts to free speech, with some of the most high profile personalities pushing back.

Still, Donald Trump campaigned vowing to protect the First Amendment. He’s not delivering. Quite the opposite.

He should do what he promised, not just be another Joe Biden.

[…]

Via https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/on-free-speech-trumps-as-bad-as-biden/

As WEF Pushes Digital ID, NIH Happily Complies by Building Health Data Platform Linking Medical Records

Madison Area Lyme Support Group

Recently, the WEF confirmed that Klaus Schwab has resigned as chair and that it has launched an investigation into the man and his wife Hilda due to allegations of misconduct using organization funds to buy a luxury mansion, private, in-room massages at hotels, and luxury holiday travel.

Schwab was the founder and 50-plus-year uncontested head honcho of the WEF which started as a $6K startup but morphed into a $390-million-a-year business  hell-bent on acquiring divine powers, hacking humans, using sound waves for mind control, ending free-will, infiltrating and destroying democratically controlled governments and infiltrating cabinetsdepopulating the earth, recalibrating free speech, and most importantly, emulating their beloved China.  Source

The WEF peaked at the height of the COVID era with global narratives like ‘The Great Reset‘, ‘build back better,’ ‘sustainability,’ inclusivity, equity, and coherence using digital ID as the linchpin at the center of a global digital panopticon devised under the auspice of the UN’s global public-private partnership ‘regime.’” (Go here for a live webinar tonight on what Real ID means for your medical privacy)

Its annual DAVOS meeting has been a virtual requirement for hungry elites with dreams of taking over the world.

The WEF appears to have fallen from grace; however, due to being a fanatical political organization masquerading as a neutral entity demanding $3.5 trillion a year (60% of the annual U.S. federal budget) to ‘decarbonize’ the planet, to ‘reach net-zero and restore nature.’ Rather than admitting that “climate change” measures  have actually hurt the environment and people, or apologizing for tracking and censoring people, pushing wars and deadly mass “vaccinations” that were ineffective but have been linked with more adverse reactions and death than any vaccine in the history of VAERS, this out of touch group naively believes it can build trust out of thin air.

And now, Schwab’s replacement as been revealed:

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe WEF Interim Chairman

Letmathe, former CEO of Nestle the largest food and beverage empire on earth, has stated that water should not be a human right.  He appears to be a perfect WEF fit:

  • Nestle is one of the largest users of water in the food and beverage industry and in 2023 withdrew 95.6 MN/m3 of water globally of which 37% was from water-stressed areas.  Half was used in their operations and half was dumped back into the environment. 
  • They have also taken water from indigenous lands in Canada in areas where locals couldn’t even get clean drinking water.
  • Nestle has been draining aquifers dry and then selling it back to consumers for profit in plastic bottles which damage the environment. (https://substack.com/home/post/p-162411666)

WEF Pushes Biometric Digital ID as Core of Global Control Grid: ‘Essential’ for Access to Banking, Benefits, and Society

Dystopian vision frames digital ID as the gateway to participation in society, controlled by governments and corporations. From Jon Fleetwood:

Eric Trump: Banks could be extinct in 10 years

Banks could be extinct in 10 years – Eric Trump

RT

Banks could face extinction within a decade if they fail to embrace blockchain technologies, US President Donald Trump’s second son Eric, a crypto entrepreneur, has warned.

In an interview with CNBC on Wednesday, Eric Trump lambasted what he described as the slowness and inefficiency of the traditional banking system.

“The modern financial system is broken, it’s slow, it’s expensive,” he told the business news channel.

Trump, who launched a bitcoin mining company called American Bitcoin in March, said he turned to digital currencies and decentralized finance when he realized that “our banking system favors the ultra-wealthy” and “was weaponized against the vast majority of people in our country.”

Decentralized finance platforms allow individuals to conduct transactions directly with one another, often with low or no fees, something traditional banks rely on to generate income.

Trump has argued that blockchain technology can perform all the functions of traditional banking systems more efficiently.

“I’m telling you, if the banks don’t watch what’s coming, they’re going to be extinct in 10 years,” he said.

In the interview, Trump also criticized the SWIFT interbank financial messaging network as an “absolute disaster,” highlighting the delays and inefficiencies in cross-border transactions.

US President Donald Trump’s family have expanded into the cryptocurrency sector, launching a decentralized finance project called World Liberty Financial. They have also announced plans for a dollar-backed stablecoin.

In 2021, major American financial services company Capital One severed ties with over 300 accounts linked to the Trump family and their businesses. The move came two months after the January 6 Capitol riot, where Trump’s supporters attempted to overturn his defeat in the 2020 presidential el

Last month, Eric and his brother Donald Jr. filed a lawsuit against Capital One, claiming its decision to close the accounts was an attack on free speech and free enterprise, and a response to their father’s political views.

Once a crypto critic, President Trump has changed his position on digital currencies, attracting significant industry support. Since returning to the White House, he has pledged to make the US the “crypto capital of the world” and to serve as a “crypto president.”
[…]
Ed Note: Seems like neither CNBC nor Eric got the memo about the new Proof of Stake (POS) technology that makes slow and energy wasting bitcoin mining obsolete. See Ground Breaking Tech Promises to Change the Landscape of  Cryptocurrency

DOGE cuts could help Elon Musk companies avoid $2 billion in liabilities: Senate report

Memo claims Elon Musk to avoid $2.37B in legal liabilities through DOGE influence

By Erin Doherty

  • A new memo from Senate Democratic committee staff accuses Elon Musk of using his perch on DOGE to “evade oversight, derail investigations, and make litigation disappear whenever he so chooses—on his terms and at his command.”
  • The memo finds that as of Inauguration Day, Musk and his companies were facing at least 65 “actual or potential” actions from 11 federal agencies. Many of those threats are now neutralized.
  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal also sent letters to SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, The Boring Company and xAI asking them to provide information on the investigations they faced before the inauguration.
  • The White House rejected any allegations that Musk has used his role in government for “personal or financial gain.”

Elon Musk may skirt more than $2 billion in possible financial liabilities by exercising his influence over the federal government, according to a report Monday from Senate Democratic committee staffers.

Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” has brought sweeping changes to Washington with its slash-and-burn campaign to gut agencies and purge the federal workforce. President Donald Trump has avidly supported Musk’s cuts.

As he appears poised to step back from his DOGE work in the coming weeks, Democrats are accusing the world’s richest person of using his influence to “evade oversight, derail investigations, and make litigation disappear whenever he so chooses—on his terms and at his command.”

The report, compiled by Democratic staff of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, found that on the day of Trump’s inauguration, Musk and his companies were facing at least 65 “actual or potential” regulatory or enforcement actions from 11 federal agencies.

These actions totaled at least $2.37 billion in potential liability, the memo says.

The companies include SpaceX, a space exploration firm, Tesla, an electric vehicle manufacturer; Neuralink, which produces brain implants; The Boring Company, a tunnel construction firm; and the artificial intelligence startup xAI.

According to the 44-page memo, the potential liabilities included $1.19 billion at Tesla for allegedly making misleading statements about its autopilot and self-driving features.

Neuralink faced $281 million in possible liability for allegedly making false statements about risks from its product, per the memo.

Additionally, the company could have been forced to pay $1.59 million in civil and criminal penalties for alleged violations of the Animal Welfare Act.

“The through line connecting many of Mr. Musk’s decisions appears to be self-enrichment and avoiding what he perceives as obstacles to advancing his interests,” reads the memo.

“The truth is that the breathtaking scope and scale of benefits Mr. Musk is gaining from his present position may never be known, and that is by design. The silence is strategic, and it is dangerous,” it says.

In the wake of the memo, the committee’s ranking member, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, sent letters to the five Musk-led companies asking them to provide information on the federal investigations they faced prior to Trump’s inauguration.

CNBC has reached out to the companies for comment.

The letters also request a rundown of the steps each company has taken to keep Musk’s government work separate from those probes. Blumenthal asks the companies to respond by May 11.

The White House sharply rejected any suggestion that Musk has used his role in government for “personal or financial gain,” saying “any assertion otherwise is completely false and defamatory.”

Blumenthal “is clearly suffering from a debilitating and uncurable case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has wilted his brain,” White House communications director Steven Cheung said in an emailed statement.

[…]

Via https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/28/elon-musk-doge-trump-legal-liabilities-senate-democrats.html

As manpower crisis plagues IDF, Israel Extends Compulsory Service

(Photo credit: AA)

The Cradle

The Israeli army has announced that it will extend mandatory service by four months due to a growing manpower crisis, coinciding with an intensification of battles in Gaza and the resurgence of deadly resistance operations against invading troops.

The additional four months will be classified as reserve duty, allowing soldiers to complete a total of three years of military service.

The military will also cancel pre-release leave for soldiers. Troops will have to serve a full three years before being discharged.

This decision follows months of intense fighting and rising casualties, which have strained troop levels.

The extra four months will provide benefits for the soldiers, given that reserve duty is usually compensated by the Israeli government. The army states that its decision is temporary and aims to help alleviate the current troop shortages.

“At the moment, we are short 10,000 troops, 7,000 of them in combat units,” the army said.

Israel announced on 26 April the death of Staff Sergeant Neta Yitzhak Kahana, an undercover operative with the Southern Border Police, who was killed during clashes with resistance fighters in Gaza.

His death marked the second Israeli soldier to be killed over the weekend. Both were killed in Gaza City’s Shujaiya neighborhood.

Israel has said that it will launch a major offensive across Gaza if no progress is made in truce negotiations. According to Tel Aviv, current operations in Gaza – which have seen the army seize at least 50 percent of the strip’s territory – aim to pressure Hamas in talks, not bring about a complete defeat of the resistance group.

An expanded assault on Gaza would include a massive call-up of reservists and operations in new areas of the strip, the army has said.

Last month, Israeli media reported that the army is facing a crisis in its reserves as a growing number of soldiers have indicated a lack of motivation and an unwillingness to serve. A senior commander in the reserves told Haaretz that there are numerous cases of reservist soldiers refusing to report for duty.

According to estimates, the response rate for the upcoming reservist call-up is expected to be no more than 50 percent. This would mark a 50 percent drop since the start of the war in 2023.

The manpower crisis Israel is facing coincides with growing tension between Israel’s political and security establishments.

Former Shin Bet chief Ami Ayalon called for civil disobedience against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following his dismissal of Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar. This came during a protest in Tel Aviv on Saturday.

Israeli protesters have also taken to the streets to demand an immediate exchange agreement in Gaza, where relentless airstrikes are endangering the lives of captives still held by the resistance.

[…]

Via https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-extends-compulsory-service-as-manpower-crisis-plagues-army

Defections Rock UAE-Backed Forces in Yemen as Trump’s War Plan Falters

Houthi supporters chant slogans during an anti-U.S. and anti-Israel rally in Sanaa, Yemen, April 18, 2025.

Ansar Allah supporters chant slogans during an anti-U.S. and anti-Israel rally in Sanaa, Yemen, April 18, 2025. Osamah Abdulrahman

By Robert Inlakesh

Around 100 officers from the UAE-backed National Resistance Forces (NRF) in Yemen have defected to join Ansar Allah, delivering a major blow to U.S. and Gulf-backed efforts inside the country. The development comes amid threats of a U.S.-supported ground offensive and intensified American airstrikes against civilian targets.

On Sunday, approximately 100 officers from Yemen’s United Arab Emirates-backed forces defected to Ansar Allah in the capital, Sanaa. Although the defectors’ identities have not been publicly disclosed, initial reports suggest that much of the group’s high command was among them.

The defections mark a serious setback for the NRF, led by Brigadier General Tareq Saleh, who holds territory along Yemen’s northwestern coast near Taiz.

Tareq Saleh, the nephew of deposed Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, sits on the Emirati-Saudi backed Presidential Leadership Council, often referred to as Yemen’s internationally recognized government. His NRF forces are aligned with Saudi and U.S.-backed groups that control southern Yemen, headquartered in the port city of Aden.

Meanwhile, protests have erupted across southern Yemen, where residents are demanding the removal of the “pro-coalition government” over worsening economic conditions, collapsing basic services, and 20-hour rolling blackouts. In Aden, the demonstrations against the Saudi-Emirati coalition continue to grow, with citizens accusing local authorities of failing to implement emergency measures to stabilize energy supplies.

Despite backing from wealthy Gulf states and U.S. support, areas under the Presidential Leadership Council’s control suffer from higher poverty rates than the 70% of Yemenis living under Ansar Allah’s Sanaa-based government.

Shortly after U.S. strikes began on March 15, President Trump claimed that Ansar Allah had been “decimated,” while Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth asserted that the military campaign was “devastatingly effective.” Six weeks later, U.S. officials have quietly admitted that the strikes have had limited impact, raising concerns over cost effectiveness and ammunition depletion.

Despite Washington’s early rhetoric, the Yemeni Armed Forces continue to target U.S. aircraft carrier strike groups, fire missiles and drones at Israel, and enjoy mass displays of public support across Yemen.

In Washington, leading think tanks are now scrambling for alternatives. The Atlantic Council recently suggested that assassinating key leaders like Abdul Malik al-Houthi could collapse the Sanaa government. The Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) argued that “only a ground operation can oust the Houthis.”

Around a week ago, reports emerged that an 80,000-strong Saudi-UAE backed force was preparing to cooperate with U.S. troops to seize Yemen’s strategic Red Sea port city of Hodeidah. However, the NRF defections could significantly complicate those plans.

Growing public discontent in southern Yemen could further jeopardize any ground operation. Massive weekly demonstrations show strong popular support for Ansar Allah’s blockade of the Red Sea and its missile attacks on Israel, actions that many in southern Yemen view as retaliation against U.S. intervention.

Instead of destroying Ansar Allah, Trump’s military escalation may be achieving the opposite: unifying a nation torn by nearly a decade of civil war.

Via https://www.mintpressnews.com/trump-yemen-officer-defections/289460/

Here’s How Much American Billionaires Lost in Trump’s First 100 Days

By Chase Peterson-Withorn

“This is what victory feels like,” Elon Musk declared the day Donald Trump was sworn in. “I’m super fired up for the future…One of the most American values that I love is optimism.”

Now, as Donald Trump begins his 100th day back in office, much of the optimism has faded as the American stock market has gotten off to its worst start in 50 years, with the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average both dropping by nearly 8% amid Trump’s tariff war.

No one has been hit harder than Musk, who is $45 billion poorer than he was on Trump’s second inauguration day. Musk has taken to feuding with Trump tariff hawk Peter Navarro on social media, has said he will step back from leading Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, and has had to refocus on his electric carmaker Tesla, after tariff fears and Musk’s increasingly unpopular political efforts have sent the stock crashing 33%.

He isn’t the only billionaire down big during Trump 2.0. Overall, America’s 800-some billionaires are $300 billion poorer since January 20. Joining Musk among the 10 biggest losers (in sheer dollar terms) are Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Alphabet’s Sergey Brin and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, three tech tycoons who scored prominent seats just behind the first family at Trump’s inauguration—and have since gone on to lose $35 billion, $26 billion and $22 billion in wealth, respectively.

Other prominent Trump backers have dropped billions, too. Oracle’s Larry Ellison—who met with Trump the day after the inauguration as part of a $500 billion an AI infrastructure initiative—is America’s third-biggest loser so far, behind Musk and Bezos, down $28 billion. Blackstone cofounder Stephen Schwarzman, who initially said he would not support longtime friend’s 2024 campaign but soon backtracked, is $11 billion poorer.

Of course some billionaires have managed to get richer despite the shaky markets. Warren Buffett—who called tariffs “an act of war, to some degree” ahead of Trump’s announcement—has kept Berkshire Hathaway steady, stashing a record $334 billion of the conglomerate’s money in cash and cash equivalents. That has helped push shares up 13% since Trump took office, adding nearly $20 billion to the Oracle of Omaha’s net worth.

Other big billionaire winners so far: Peter Thiel (up $4.9 billion) and Alexander Karp ($3.6 billion), whose AI-powered data mining firm Palantir is America’s hottest stock, thanks in part to defense and software contracts with U.S. government agencies. The three surviving children of Walmart founder Sam Walton (d. 1992), meanwhile, are each at least $3 billion richer, as consumers have flocked to the retail giant amid elevated inflation; last week, Walmart CEO Doug McMillon met with Trump to argue against tariffs. And while former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, who has kept much of his wealth in the tech giant’s stock, losing $8 billion so far in the process, founder Bill Gates has diversified his fortune into a wide range of investments, including a 35% stake in waste company Republic Services (up 15%), helping make him a big gainer.

President Trump, meanwhile, has not been kind to businessman Trump. The commander-in-chief’s fortune is down $1.5 billion since he took charge of the U.S. government, as shares of his Trump Media & Technology Group—the parent company of Truth Social—have plunged by 35%, quadruple the broader market’s drop. He’s clearly paying attention to the gyrations. Standing in the Oval Office on April 9, Trump pointed to brokerage billionaire Charles Schwab: “He made $2.5 billion today,” he bragged, then turned to automotive billionaire Roger Penske: “And he made $900 million.” Both fortunes have continued to climb since then, but after racking up huge losses earlier in Trump’s first 100 days, Schwab is only $375 million, or 3%, richer than he was on the last day of Joe Biden’s presidency. Penske, meanwhile, is $1.1 billion poorer.

Here are the 10 biggest American losers and the 10 biggest American winners of Trump’s second presidency, as of his 100th day in office.

*Based on U.S. citizens with a majority of wealth held in public companies. Net worth changes measured from the market close on January 17, 2025 to the market close on April 28, 2025.

Biggest losers:

10. Steve Ballmer

Source of wealth: Microsoft

Net worth: $117.6 bil

Loss since Trump’s inauguration: -$8.4 bil

9. Stephen Schwarzman

Source of wealth: Blackstone

Net worth: $41.6 bil

Loss: -$10.9 bil

8. Michael Dell

Source of wealth: Dell Computers

Net worth: $98.2 bil

Loss: -$16.8 bil

7. Mark Zuckerberg

Source of wealth: Facebook

Net worth: $190.3 bil

Loss: -$21.5 bil

6. Jensen Huang

Source of wealth: Nvidia

Net worth: $95.2 bil

Loss: $24.9 bil

5. Sergey Brin

Source of wealth: Google

Net worth: $128.4 bil

Loss: -$25.6 bil

4. Larry Page

Source of wealth: Google

Net worth: $134 bil

Loss: -$27.4 bil

3. Larry Ellison

Source of wealth: Oracle

Net worth: $176.4 bil

Loss: -$28.2 bil

2. Jeff Bezos

Source of wealth: Amazon

Net worth: $204.6 bil

Loss: -$34.8 bil

1. Elon Musk

Source of wealth: Tesla, SpaceX

Net worth: $388.6 bil

Loss: -$45.3 bil

Biggest gainers:

10. Bill Gates

Source of wealth: Microsoft

Net worth: $108.9 bil

Gain: +$2.5 bil

9. Robert Duggan

Source of wealth: Pharmaceuticals

Net worth: $15.4 bil

Gain: +$2.9 bil

8. Alice Walton

Source of wealth: Walmart

Net worth: $104.4 bil

Gain: +$3 bil

7. Jim Walton & family

Source of wealth: Walmart

Net worth: $112.2 bil

Gain: +$3.1 bi

6. Rob Walton & family

Source of wealth: Walmart

Net worth: $113.4 bil

Gain: +$3.1 bil

5. Alexander Karp

Source of wealth: Palantir

Net worth: $10.6 bil

Gain: +$3.6 bil

4. Lin Bin

Source of wealth: Smartphones

Net worth: $15 bil

Gain: +$3.7 bil

3. Brad Jacobs

Source of wealth: Logistics

Net worth: $12.6 bil

Gain: +$4 bil

Peter Thiel

Source of wealth: Facebook, investments

Net worth: $19.3 bil

Gain: +$4.9 bil

1. Warren Buffett

Source of wealth: Berkshire Hathaway

Net worth: $165.8 bil

Gain: +$19.6 bil

BRICS Nations Accelerate Efforts to Establish New International Payment System to Thwart US Tariffs

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Pepe Escobar, the Brazilian international journalist, recently returned from his visit to China where he spent time in Shanghai and Hong Kong, home to the two largest ports in China.

He was interviewed by Danny Haiphong, and I am including the interview here, which I listened to this past weekend.

Escobar states:

Trump managed to do what I would say (is) the impossible, to antagonize 1.4 billion Chinese, at the same time.

And there’s no turning back. So Trump cannot expect a phone call from China.

He explains how BRICS, which will meet this summer in Brazil, is now accelerating their plans to implement a new international payment system so countries can bypass the U.S. banking system and the U.S. dollar, as they begin to exclude the U.S. market due to these high tariffs.

Escobar mentions the analogy that President Trump is using for his tariffs, which is that the U.S. is a “store” and that any country who wants to buy U.S. goods in this “store” has to meet Trump’s pricing based on tariffs.

Escobar responds: “But what he doesn’t realize is that nobody wants to buy anything in this store anymore” as the BRICS nations begin to reshape their supply chains and exports.

Also covered in this interview is the amazing announcement from Russia that the Kursk region has now been 100% liberated, as Russia announces, for the first time in public, that they did so with the help of North Korean military forces.

He also explains how Iran is a huge part of BRICS plans for the future, and the implementation of the new Silk Road trade initiatives.

Watch the full interview:

 

[…]

Via https://vaccineimpact.com/2025/brics-nations-accelerate-efforts-to-establish-new-international-payment-system-to-fight-back-against-u-s-tariffs/

The Late John Judge on 9/11

The Late John Judge on 9/11

Talking Stick TV (2002)

Film Review

I was fortunate to attend this talk on February 13, 2002, just five months after 9/11. This was the first we learned 9/11 was an inside job – when Judge informed us of the Air Force stand down order (not to intercept the 747 heading for the Pentagon).

Prior to his death in 2014, Judge chaired the JFK Assassination Review Board. The latter was an independent organization created under The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. It was the Review Board’s responsibility to review the six million pages of classified documents the Act forced the Clinton administration to release. The law was a response to massive popular pressure following the release of Oliver Stone’s 1991 film JFK.

As Judge explains in the video, prior to 9/11 he was working with congress woman Cynthia McKinney to establish an expert panel to lobby for the release of 600,000-700,000 pages of classified documents related to the Martin Luther King assassination.*

Judge goes on to talk about Secretary of State Colin Powell informing Middle East counterparts in July 2001 about US plans to invade Afghanistan, owing to the refusal by the Taliban (which the US had installed to run Afghanistan) to agree to the proposed Unocal oil pipeline pipeline connecting the Caspian Sea to the Persian Gulf.

Judge also speaks about Al Qaeda not representing Islam, and how most terrorism is phony terrorism sponsored by Western powers to forward their own political agendas.


*The panel was cancelled after 9-11. By law these records are scheduled to be released in 2026.