Peggy Hall

Yesterday I spoke with Dane Wiggington, a returning guest and founder of Geoengineering Watch. Many of you may already follow him on Instagram and YouTube, where he provides insightful analysis on climate manipulation and its impacts. In this interview, we’re taking a closer look at Hurricane Helene and discussing whether its formation and path were natural or intentionally manipulated. We’ll dive into what Dane refers to as toxic interventions in our skies, and he will break down some of the most alarming signs that this storm may not have been purely nature’s doing.

[…]

For now, here are some key points from Dane’s video ‘Hurricane Helene And Frequency Transmissions, 90 Second Alert:’

• Circular blue flashes seen in the video are believed to be frequency transmissions
• Evidence suggests that atmospheric frequency transmissions can repel air masses, especially when they contain electrically conductive nanoparticles.
• Brighter blue flashes indicate stronger transmissions, leading to a more pronounced repelling effect on storms in the vicinity.
• In areas without blue flashes, there is no transmission, and storms can move freely in those directions.

So this raises the question: Was Hurricane Helen’s path and behavior simply the result of natural climate processes, or was it engineered through intentional atmospheric manipulation?

Friends, this information is best listened to, so here you go:

[…]

https://peggyhall.substack.com/p/hurricane-helene-frequency-transmission

Ed Note: Excellent discussion on Badlands Daily on atypical path of both Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton: https://rumble.com/v5hrthx-badlands-daily-monday-october-7-2024.html