The studies compiled below demonstrate how COVID vaccine Mandates provide no overall health benefit to the community and can even be harmful.
The following research papers and studies raise doubts that COVID vaccine mandates are backed by science and good public-health practice.
Anyone seeking to challenge these mandates should carefully consult these studies, which demonstrate how the mandates provide no overall health benefit to the community and can even be harmful.
Individuals should decide whether to get the vaccine based on their own assessment of risks in consultation with informed medical professionals.
The model of Marek’s disease (“leaky” non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not stop infection or transmission) and the concept of the Original Antigenic Sin (the initial priming of the immune system prejudices the immune response to the pathogen or similar pathogen life-long) may explain what we are potentially facing now with these mass mandates of COVID vaccines: immune escape, increased transmission, faster transmission and potentially more “hotter” variants.
Mandates result in the forced separation and segregation of society. They create hazards for people in their professional lives. For example, why would governments impose punitive career-altering vaccine mandates on an unvaccinated nurse who is most likely already immune due to natural exposure?
Mandates also represent an encroachment on freedom and liberties, and call into question the motives behind these mandates when the science shows no public benefit compared with the costs.
Below are studies that call into question COVID-19 vaccine mandates:
| 1) No Significant Difference in Viral Load Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated, Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Groups When Infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant, Acharya, 2021 | “Found no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta.” |
| 2) Vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals have similar viral loads in communities with a high prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant, Riemersma, 2021 | “No difference in viral loads when comparing unvaccinated individuals to those who have vaccine “breakthrough” infections.
“Furthermore, individuals with vaccine breakthrough infections frequently test positive with viral loads consistent with the ability to shed infectious viruses … “if vaccinated individuals become infected with the delta variant, they may be sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others … “data substantiate the idea that vaccinated individuals who become infected with the Delta variant may have the potential to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others.” |
| 3) Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections, Gazit, 2021 | “Natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity …
“SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccines had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected.” … para 27 fold increased risk of symptomatic COVID and 8 fold increased risk of hospitalization (vaccinated over unvaccinated). |
| 4) Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccination Against Risk of Symptomatic Infection, Hospitalization, and Death Up to 9 Months: A Swedish Total-Population Cohort Study, Nordström, 2021 | Report on their study which shows that (cohort comprised 842,974 pairs (N=1,684,958), including individuals vaccinated with 2 doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, mRNA-1273, or BNT162b2, and matched unvaccinated individuals)
“vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 against infection waned progressively from 92% (95% CI, 92-93, P<0·001) at day 15-30 to 47% (95% CI, 39-55, P<0·001) at day 121-180, and from day 211 and onwards no effectiveness could be detected (23%; 95% CI, -2-41, P=0·07)” …while the vaccine provides temporary protection against infection, the efficacy declines below zero and then to negative efficacy territory at approximately 7 months, underscoring that the vaccinated are highly susceptible to infection and eventually become highly infected (more so than the unvaccinated). |
[…]
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/science-studies-covid-vaccine-mandates/
The Most Revolutionary Act 
Pingback: UCSF study reveals vaccinated 6x more likely to be hospitalized than unvaccinated | Worldtruth