*
*
Judges and lawyers know that – if someone intentionally destroys evidence – he’s probably trying to hide his crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who destroyed the evidence.So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11?
Source – zerohedge.com
– “…An FBI whistleblower named Sibel Edmonds has been deemed credible by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General – The ACLU described Edmonds as: “The most gagged person in the history of the United States of America…the government has gone to extraordinary lengths to prosecute and harass whistleblowers and journalists who write stories questioning government narratives”:
9/11 Anniversary: Government Hid and Destroyed 9/11 Evidence
Presumption of a Cover-Up …
Judges and lawyers know that – if someone intentionally destroys evidence – he’s probably trying to hide his crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who destroyed the evidence.
So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11?
Judge and Prosecutor Destroy Evidence
For example, it was revealed in May that the judge overseeing the trial of surviving…
View original post 2,276 more words
The Most Revolutionary Act 
With my blog working again, see also:
„Nine Eleven One And A Half Decade Ago: Whose Conspiracy?“ https://wipokuli.wordpress.com/2016/09/10/nine-eleven-one-and-a-half-decade-ago-whose-conspiracy-part-1/
Happy Weekend!
LikeLike
Excellent article, Schluter. Thanks.
LikeLike