6 thoughts on “A Top Oncologist Speaks about Wi-Fi in Schools”

1. Google top sufferance to my search for Current guidelines for exposure to wi-fi is Wi-Fi exposures & guidelines – WiFiinschools.org.uk
   wifiinschools.org.uk/16.html
   แปลหน้านี้
   Current ICNIRP (1998) guidelines for general public exposure for 2.45GHz are: … Wi-Fi-enabled computers have been reported to generally expose the user(s) .. thank you google but i don’t have a clue what there talking about. My Family of 3 must spend a least a totle of 15 hr a day on internet and i am worried.

   LikeLike

   Reply ↓

   • My understanding is that current guidelines advising using broadband where possible instead of Wi-fi. If switching to broadband isn’t an option, most experts feel it’s really important to limit children’s exposure.

     Click to access wireless-radiation-reduce-exposure.pdf

     http://www.safeinschool.org/

     Smart meters are far more dangerous than wi-fi – there produce 5-10 times as much EMF radiation are far more frequent reports of health problems. Don’t let your power company put one on your home.

     LikeLike

     Reply ↓

     • My 8yo prefers to use our PC with broadband but wife has two smartphones and sometimes her lap top going because she has small Facebook based business going and things may not change because of economics

       LikeLike

       Reply ↓

2. https://www.google.co.th/search?q=.+Current+guidelines+for+exposure&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gws_rd=cr&ei=MXRqV6nbFcvZvgSXk4LABQ#q=.+Current+guidelines+for+exposure+to+wi-fi

   LikeLike

   Reply ↓

3. Placing a router across the room where one sleeps is indeed unhealthy. Placing it behind a wall does not beam more than LTE on a roof. There are many resident blocks with antennas placed and directed reciprocally to guarantee optimal reception, because a house right under an antenna has almost no radiation – as mandated by law. So many parents I talked with complained about wifi but were ignorant about the subject of GSM/LTE-bands placed in their neighborhood. LTE is far worse, as now residents forgo a land line and even surf directly on LTE-Bands in some countries and they can because most countries except Germany and the US have widespread >10Mbit/s per user symmetrically.

   Properly configured wifi-routers don’t radiate the same amount. Factory defaults of some brands set beacons to 10ms, most set it to 100ms meaning sometimes every ms a packet in busy neighborhoods during nighttime, when nobody uses it. Beacons can be set to once a second, meaning several packets per second instead and this does not take longer to connect, as handhelds and computers send out actively seeking packets. Then there are standards for interoperability, which lowers resends and re-handshaking during use. And you still can turn off a device if you don’t use it. Uiuiui.

   I am more worried that wifi in schools makes them even dumber and they can’t figure out anything when they are grown up. This is a much higher risk than some hypothetical and configurable radiation.

   https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/oct/09/ban-under-threes-watching-television

   LikeLike

   Reply ↓

   • Good to have this technical information, Oelsen. Thanks.

     LikeLike

     Reply ↓

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.