arabesques image

Arabesque$: Enquête sur le rôle des États-Unis dans les révoltes arabes

(Investigation into the US Role in the Arab Uprisings)

by Ahmed Bensaada

Investig’Action (2015)

(in French)

Book Review

Arabesque$, an update of Ahmed Bensaada’s 2011 book L’Arabesque Américaine, concerns the US government role in instigating, funding and coordinating the Arab Spring “revolutions.” Obviously most of this history has been carefully suppressed by the western media.

The new book devotes much more attention to the personalities leading the 2011 uprisings. Some openly admitted to receiving CIA funding. Others had no idea because it was deliberately concealed from them. A few (in Egypt and Syria) were officially charged with espionage. In Egypt, seven sought refuge in the US embassy in Cairo and had to be evacuated by the State Department.

Democracy: America’s Biggest Export

According to Bensaada, the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) Arab Spring revolutions have four unique features in common:

1. None were spontaneous – all required careful and lengthy (5+ years) planning, by the State Department, CIA pass through foundations, George Soros, and the pro-Israel lobby.*.
2. All focused exclusively on removing reviled despots without replacing the autocratic power structure that kept them in power.
3. No Arab Spring protests made any reference whatsoever to powerful anti-US sentiment over Palestine and Iraq
4. All the instigators of Arab Spring uprisings were middle class, well educated youth who mysteriously vanished after 2011.

Nonviolent Regime Change

Bensaada begins by introducing non-violent guru Gene Sharp (see The CIA and Nonviolence), his links with the Pentagon and US intelligence, and his role, as director of the Albert Einstein Institution, in the “color” revolutions** in Eastern Europe and the attempted coup against Hugo Chavez in 2002.

The US goal in the Arab Spring revolutions was to replace unpopular despotic dictators while taking care to maintain the autocratic US-friendly infrastructure that had brought them to power. All initially followed the nonviolent precepts Sharp outlines in his 1994 book From Dictatorship to Democracy. In Libya, Syria and Yemen, the US and their allies were clearly prepared to introduce paid mercenaries when their Sharpian “revolutions” failed to produce regime change.

Follow the Money

Relying mainly on Wikileaks cables and the websites of key CIA pass through foundations (which he reproduces in the appendix), Bensaada methodically lists every State Department conference and workshop the Arab Spring heroes attended, the dollar amounts spent on them by the State Department and key “democracy” promoting foundations,*** the specific involvement of Google, Facebook, Twitter and Obama’s 2008 Internet campaign team in training Arab Spring cyperactivists in encryption technologies and social media skills, US embassy visits, and direct encounters with Hillary Clinton,  Condoleezza Rice, John McCain, Barack Obama and Serbian trainers from CANVAS (the CIA-backed organization that overthrew Slobodan Milosevic in 2000).

Bensaada focuses most heavily on the Tahrir Square uprising in Egypt. The Washington Post has estimated approximately 10,000 Egyptians took part in NED and USAID training in social media and nonviolent organizing techniques. For me the most astonishing information in this chapter concerned the role of an Egyptian exile (a former Egyptian policeman named Omar Afifi Suleiman) in coordinating the Tahrir Square protests from his office in Washington DC. According to Wikileaks, NED paid Suleiman a yearly stipend of $200,000+ between 2008-2011.

When Nonviolence Fails

Arabesques$ devotes far more attention to Libya, Syria and Yemen than Bensaada’s first book.

In the section on Libyia, Bensaada zeroes in on eleven key US assets who engineered the overthrow of Gaddafi. Some participated in the same State Department trainings as the Middle East opposition activists and instigated nonviolent Facebook and Twitter protests to coincide with the 2011 uprisings in Tunisian and Egypt. Others, in exile, underwent guerrilla training sponsored by the CIA, Mossad, Chad and Saudi Arabia. A few months after Kaddafi’s assassination, some of these same militants would lead Islamic militias attempting to overthrow Assad in Syria.

Between 2005 and 2010, the State Department funneled $12 million to opposition groups opposed to Assad. The US also financed Syrian exiles in Britain to start an anti-government cable TV channel they beamed into Syria.

In the section on Syria, Bensaada focuses on a handful of Syrian opposition activists who received free US training in cyberactivism and nonviolent resistance beginning in 2006. One, Ausama Monajed, is featured in the 2011 film How to Start a Revolution about his visit with Gene Sharp in 2006. Monajed and others worked closely with the US embassy, funded by the Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI). This is a State Department program that operates in countries (such as Libya and Syria) where USAID is banned.

In February 2011, these groups posted a call on Twitter and Facebook for a Day of Rage. Nothing happened. When Sharpian techniques failed to produce a sizable nonviolent uprising, as in Libya, they and their allies (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and Jordan) were all set up to introduce Islamic mercenaries (many directly from Libya) to declare war on the Assad regime.


*I was astonished to learn that Forum Fikra, a forum for Arab activists working against authoritarian governments, was mainly funded by the Nathan and Esther K Wagner Family Foundation. The latter also funds numerous pro-Israel groups and projects, as well as the Washington Institute for Near East policy (a pro-Israel group with close ties to AIPAC).

**The color revolutions were CIA-instigated uprisings that replaced democratically elected pro-Russian governments with equally autocratic governments more friendly to US corporate interests:

Serbia (2000) – Bulldozer Revolution
Georgia (2002) – Rose Revolution
Ukraine (2004) – Orange Revolution
Kyrgyzstan (2005) – Tulip Revolution

***Democracy promoting foundations (as used here, “democracy” is synonymous with capitalism, ie favorable to the interests of US investors). Here are seven of the main ones involved in funding and training Arab Spring activists:
USAID (US Agency for International Development) – State Department agency charged with economic development and humanitarian aid with a long history of financing destabilization activities, especially in Latin America.
NED (National Endowment for Democracy) – national organization supported by State Department and CIA funding dedicated to the promotion of democratic institutions throughout the world, primary funder of IRI and NDI.
IRI (International Republican Institute) – democracy promoting organization linked with the Republican Party, currently chaired by Senator John McCain and funded by NED.
NDI (National Democratic Institute for International Affairs) – democracy promoting organization linked with the Democratic Party, currently chaired by Madeline Albright and funded by NED.
OSI (Open Society Institute) – founded by George Soros in 1993 to help fund color revolutions in Eastern Europe. Also contributed major funding to Arab Spring revolutions.
• Freedom House – US organization that supports nonviolent citizens initiatives in societies were liberty is denied or threatened, financed by USAID, NED and the Soros Foundation.
CANVAS (Center for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies) – center originally founded by the Serbian activists of Otpor who the US funded and trained to over throw Slobodan Milosevic and who were instrumental in training Arab Spring activists. Funded by Freedom House, IRI and George Soros.

Originally published in Dissident Voice

 

Comments
  1. sojourner says:

    This conforms what other articles have claimed. I have had this opinion for a long time now.

    Has there ever been a more corrupt nation on the face of this earth than this one? What makes the U.S. Corporation so different from other ruthless, imperialistic nations throughout history, is only that it has the capability to force itself on the entire planet, which it does continually at will.

  2. sojourner says:

    Reblogged this on An Outsider's Sojourn II and commented:
    The U.S. Corporation: destroyer of humanity and the planet!

  3. PeaceFrog says:

    The Polish pope John Paul was a CIA mouthpiece and gave a great deal of legitimacy to Solidarity in Poland’s break with the USSR.

    KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet counterintelligence expert, and explains that there are NO grassroots revolutions, and they all are led by Mil/Intel. IMO, this explains the failure of Occupy Wall Street and the floundering Black Lives Matter:

    • When I was a grassroots activist in Seattle, all but one of the groups I worked with (the exception was a group of doctors) were infiltrated. And it was quite typically for the undercover informants to work their way into a position of leadership.

      • PeaceFrog says:

        I think most people who follow alternative media believe that there is heavy domestic infiltration of various activist groups. If John Paul was made Pope, in part, for the CIA’s plan of colored revolutions in Eastern Europe, this has wider implications. It would suggest that Washington has, at minimum, a veto power in the selection of the Pope. It would not be a much further stretch to suggest that Brussels, and the entire EU was constructed as a tool of Washington. 97% of countries aligned with the “Western Consensus”. This is an achievement that may have been seen as too ambitious for Hitler or Stalin.

  4. How little we know about the forces that really govern our lives!

  5. gerry campeau says:

    This is one book i like to read but in your description it seams to not go far enough to nail US, Israel and Saudis naming NATHAN WAGNER, 600 CENTRAL AVE STE 365, HIGHLAND PARK IL 60035-3257 Assets: $3,235,982 as of 2013/09 income: $671,634 in year ending 2013 is to small. Saad Hariri, Lebanese-Saudi billionaire has been shipping arms to Syria from start but no mention. I think there are far darker ways they facilitated Arab Spring.

  6. Norman Pilon says:

    I noticed that they picked up your review on Global Research. Ahmed Bensaada is also endorsing it. A good piece of work — as always.

  7. […] Source: The Arab Spring: Made in the USA […]

  8. Alan Scott says:

    Another invaluable exposé! I’m reblogging this on Turkey File.

  9. Thanks for reblogging, Alan.

  10. […] On October 27, 2015, Dr. Bramhall posted her review of Arabesque$, an update of Ahmed Bensaada’s 2011 book L’Arabesque Américaine. None of the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) Arab Spring revolutions were spontaneous, Bramhall cites Bensaada as concluding. Bramhall’s book review is currently available at this link: https://stuartjeannebramhall.com/2015/10/27/the-arab-spring-made-in-the-usa/ […]

  11. […] Ex-French foreign minister Ronald Dumas has admitted that Zionist Jews control French government. He has also claimed that current war against Syrian president Bashar al-Assad was planned two years before the Arab Spring: Made in USA. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s